[Peace-presence] Undermining Credibility

[richard]

and gail only scraped the surface of the sea of other questions.



"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is contempt prior to investigation." —HERBERT SPENCER

************************

You know,it is odd how some of us seem to be afraid to even 

entertain any of the many questions which arise from 9/11.  

 

Many of those who question the official version of what happened on 9/11 are scholars who have done extensive, credible research and raise excellent questions.  To dismiss them all as "conspiracy nuts" whose presence is a taint on "our" peace movement seems to me to be another version of sheep-ism.

 

Maybe it was an inside job; maybe not.  But wouldn't it be sort of 

interesting to know why Building 7 fell in its own footprint several hours after not being hit, or how the steel in the towers was 

apparently melted by burning jet fuel whose kindling point was too low to melt steel, why nobody's got a photograph of the airplane that hit the Pentagon, why NORAD didn't move, etc., etc.?  We could at least learn something about physics and bureaucracy.

 

- Gail



_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com